1. Liability of district
2. Measure of damages
3. Miscellaneous
1. Liability of district
Legislature is without power to make a grant in fee of, or an easement over, public school lands without compensation for the damage for such taking or use. State v. Platte Valley Public Power and Irrigation Dist., 143 Neb. 661, 10 N.W.2d 631 (1943).
District is liable in damages for public school lands taken under condemnation proceedings for irrigation canal. State ex rel. Johnson v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 143 Neb. 153, 8 N.W.2d 841 (1943).
A public power district which, by constructing and maintaining a tailrace, destroys by drainage the subirrigation waters of lands of others, is liable for resulting damages. Luchsinger v. Loup River Public Power Dist., 140 Neb. 179, 299 N.W. 549 (1941).
2. Measure of damages
Where land is taken for temporary use only, measure of compensation is not the market value but what the property is fairly worth during the time which it is held. Pierce v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irr. Dist., 143 Neb. 898, 11 N.W.2d 813 (1943).
The measure of damages recoverable by a landowner, whose land is permanently injured by seepage water, is the difference between the reasonable market value of the property before and after the injury plus the value of the crop injured in the field at the time of seepage, but shall not include compensation for loss of the use of the land for subsequent years caused by the same seepage. Heiden v. Loup River Public Power Dist., 139 Neb. 754, 298 N.W. 736 (1941).
Where, in a condemnation proceeding, both parties adopt an incorrect theory as to the measure of damages and an instruction is given fairly reflecting that theory, it will be adhered to on appeal. Behle v. Loup River Public Power Dist., 138 Neb. 566, 293 N.W. 413 (1940).
Damages recoverable in the condemnation by an irrigation district of land damaged by seepage from the irrigation reservoir are only those arising from the condemnation, and evidence as to the value of the land must be based upon its value in the condition in which it was at the time of the condemnation. In re Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 137 Neb. 313, 289 N.W. 383 (1939).
Damages for injury to land due to seepage from an irrigation reservoir are not continuous in character but original and recoverable in one action; the measure of such damages is the difference in value of the land before and after the dam was erected, taking into consideration the uses to which the land was put and for which it was reasonably suited. Applegate v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 136 Neb. 280, 285 N.W. 585 (1939).
3. Miscellaneous
Omaha Public Power District subject to garnishment process to same extent as any electric and power company. Schreiner v. Irby Constr. Co., 184 Neb. 222, 166 N.W.2d 121 (1969).
All the obligations imposed and rights declared under other specified statutes are preserved by this section. State ex rel. Dawson County Feed Products v. Omaha P. P. Dist., 174 Neb. 350, 118 N.W.2d 7 (1962).
Provisions of general irrigation act are only incorporated so far as they are applicable. Halligan v. Elander, 147 Neb. 709, 25 N.W.2d 13 (1946).
Legislature did not expressly restrict district in nature of title to be taken under eminent domain, but gave it power to take what was necessary for the public use for which the taking was authorized, up to and including the fee. Burnett v. Central Neb. P. P. & I. Dist., 147 Neb. 458, 23 N.W.2d 661 (1946).
In condemning a right-of-way for an irrigation lateral, the benefit accruing to all irrigable land within the irrigation system's area of delivery by reason of the availability of water must be considered as a general benefit, and is not deductible from the consequential damages to land not taken. Prudential Insurance Company v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 139 Neb. 114, 296 N.W. 752 (1941).
Public power districts are governed as to their use and occupation of highways by the statutes relating to irrigation districts so far as they are applicable. Wright v. Loup River Public Power Dist., 133 Neb. 715, 277 N.W. 53 (1938).
In exercising the power of eminent domain to obtain right-of-way over private property, a public power district is not restricted to condemnation along boundary lines. Johnson v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 133 Neb. 97, 274 N.W. 386 (1937).
Power of eminent domain is expressly conferred. State ex rel. Loseke v. Fricke, 126 Neb. 736, 254 N.W. 409 (1934).